Jump to content

J4MES OX4D

FGers
  • Posts

    10,854
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    503

Everything posted by J4MES OX4D

  1. I wanted to get PES again this year but once more; it's a bloody PS3 port on the PC and the PS4 version looks like a copy and paste from last year but seems to look and play worse. My hatred of Cuntnami this year is another massive factor. FIFA 17 is just a fixed FIFA 16 and nothing too special but as a football fan; I don't think either series is anywhere near the standard it should be. MLB The Show and NBA 2K just ooze that level of authenticity that I wish we had in the football games. Shame I don't like Basketball or Baseball really! ^Rich
  2. This game is coming out in a couple of months and it looks absolutely epic! The amount of creative tools is just incredible and it looks so polished. Can't wait!
  3. Just played a couple of matches and FIFA seems really decent this year. It's possibly not the massive step up expected with Frostbite but visually it does still impress and in gameplay terms, it's far more fluid and polished when compared to FIFA 16. Still undecided if I'll invest in a football game this year but if I had to pick one; it would probably be this. FucKonami and Adam Bhatti
  4. ^ that is some serious bullshit. So they've basically referred to the policy now Hello Games are releasing patches!? They can't apply the policy retroactively or futuristically so that is a ludicrous move by Sony support. Bit strange that last week they were issuing refunds regardless of how many hours a user played let alone the the fact they downloaded it and now its a brick wall for people as these free updates are on the way. What a joke! That still doesn't account for all the missing features that were lied about and there's no word if these will be included later on in free updates or within the paid DLC that Hello Games weren't doing but now are... I'd consider contacting Trading Standards or the ASA for some advice on this and they are probably already aware of this situation.
  5. The one seater tanks you can't spawn into for obvious reasons but you can pretty much spawn direct in any other vehicle - even into the passenger seats of planes in mid flight.
  6. They need to remove the stupid 'Participation' Medals or at least allow users to disable them. Not only do they take up a portion of the screen, they sounds they make every 2 seconds is that of Advanced Warfare. Just one kill can get you about 10 flying across the screen! This CoD game was when they didn't cater towards bad players or had to make people feel special but it seems even a half arsed kill from two yards now earns you a string of medals including longshot, epic kill, sharpshooter, 1337 l3g3nd, noscope with no scope medals popping up
  7. I'm hoping that the infestation of players who weren't even trying or just messing around is just down to the fact it was a open beta. It'll be mortifying if these clueless/useless 'CoD' type players actually get the game and play like that. I played a handful of matches and with Battlefield in general; as long as 25 players are doing the business; it's usually a good experience but in the BF1 beta; there were just loads running round like headless chickens, spawn camping or hiding within the map boundaries whilst headglitching. I think players will be more sensible on release only the more dedicated ones will buy it but even so; with these new conquest rules; that could really bring out the worst even with seasoned Battlefield players.
  8. Ah that's weird as I was in a ticket based lobby yesterday but that was probably due to it being on a private experimental branch. I did play on the core servers a few times but didn't even notice that it was purely score based. If they don't have a ticket bleed and it's first to 300 then that's completely screwed up the mode then as players will only be protecting their K/D or not caring about dying as they can then just respawn in a good position without consequence for the team. Pretty daft game design really and that's got me worried about it going pure arcade with musical chairs gamemodes.
  9. Oh wow, so Pro is the Neo. That means that the Scorpio has a massive advantage in terms of power but the PS4 Pro will have a year head start pretty much. Usually it's the other way round! It wouldn't surprise me if we see a PS4 Pro 2 in 3 years time either then...
  10. This is a pretty retarded piece of marketing that will only lead to disappointment. Doing a '4K' tech demo on architecture that isn't capable of native support is just going to mislead people before the inevitable release cries of 'downgrade'. 1080p and 60fps should be the priority and not semi-4K compatibility upscaled at a risk of framerates below 30fps. I can see so many publishers playing the 4K card just to help shift the 'new gen' of consoles but people are going to be let down in the long run and it'll just be a repeat of the current gen when games have to be scaled down and performance is well below standard.
  11. I enjoyed the beta and am looking forward to the release next month. Shame we only had access to one map which was one of the worst I've ever seen in a Battlefield game but the gameplay seems pretty decent although some classes have it oh so easy with no bullet drop at range and simple OHK's. Hopefully Conquest wont be that fast paced on every map either but glad they upped the score to 300 which meant matches lasted close to half hour and it's those high ticket matches that made BF4 so epic.
  12. Is this the Neo or the Slim or some other console? I honestly can't keep track but it appears to be the equivalent of the Xbox One S. No 4K Blu Ray either. Can't see any console game running 4K native for another 5 years anyway - this and the Scorpio is more likely just to push 1080p with 60fps guaranteed. If they start too soon with 4K focused support; we'll be back to square one just like we were in the current gen with games running at a downscaled resolution and sub 30fps. Insert other media
  13. They are trying to keep people on board with the 'promise' of 'significant' DLC but even some of this doesn't even come close to what was originally supposed to be in the game in the first place that they have still yet to acknowledge why such features were absent. The upcoming DLC is just a desperate attempt to save face to the few that's left on it and the ultimate kick in the teeth is that it would likely be paid DLC despite Murray originally saying that there would be none http://www.gamespot.com/articles/no-mans-sky-could-get-paid-dlc/1100-6442663/ So not only were users ripped off and stripped of key features; the new ones that could appear in DLC form just as filler might even have a price tag. All the 'free' updates so far have just been fixes but proper content which should've been in the base game will cost the user even more and they still likely wont get anything that was originally outlined up until July 2016. These developers are complete and utter scum and Murray is a prized cock and people should be entitled to get a refund no matter what. If people want to retain the game then fair enough but if they want any meaningful content; it'll cost them even more than the outlandish £40/$60 they paid in the first place. The fact Murray is a proven liar on countless occasions really makes me hope that nobody pays these bastards any more cash and that they are brought to some form of justice. Not even Ubisoft or EA have sunk this low and Hello Games have not only been naive but they've been deliberately deceptive on a ridiculous level.
  14. I'd probably only consider getting it if it was sold separately for no more than £14.99. It is inevitable Activision will sell it standalone six or so months down the line once Infinite Warfare has dried up its revenues but anything more at that time than $20 would be ludicrous. It will probably cost £30/$40 though! From what I've seen; it doesn't even look that decent of a remaster and the new audio is quite frankly horrendous with some even swiped from Advanced bloody Warfare. The campaign is iconic and the MP would still be good for a few matches here and there but the only reason this has been produced is to simply bail Infinite Warfare out of a major embarrassment.
  15. Meh
  16. Looks worse than the F2P game Dirty Bomb. Certainly more drab than BO3 and looks like it plays like a combination of Ghosts and the original Homefront. At times it even looks like an old gen game.
  17. Reveal trailer Beta October 14th. Also announced that MW:R will be getting all 16 maps in the end for free.
  18. A 'better' video
  19. It's pretty bad apparently and a cross between Ghosts and Black Ops 3 which for me is my worst nightmare! I think the full MP reveal trailer is today..
  20. Peak time and EA servers are down - what a surprise! The two games I played this morning were fantastic but I then played a couple more this evening and the lag kicked in. Was gonna try tonight but no luck getting on the servers which is bloody typical!
  21. Are you talking about the banner or his penis?
  22. Played a couple of matches and the game runs really well and the engine is nice and fluid. Shame the beta map on offer so far is one of the worst I've ever played on in Battlefield though but hopefully we'll get another one in the coming days.
  23. Seems that Sony, Steam and Amazon are offering no questions asked refunds on No Man's Sky. It was either this or a worldwide lawsuit I'd imagine against Hello Games for false advertising in which everyone would be entitled to their money back anyway if the claim won and that looked a certainty with the mounting evidence against the dodgy developers. This move will keep the lawyers at bay and anyone that keeps their copy is seen as accepting the game at face value but either way; shocking but highly expected and embarrassing outcome that was just deserts for developers dishonest on a level you wouldn't even see from the likes of Ubisoft http://gamerant.com/no-mans-sky-refund-542/
  24. It's 60% off right now for the next 48 hours on Steam and I'm pretty tempted as it's one game I've wanted but never got round to grabbing for some reason.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy