Jump to content

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Luseth said:

 

Not quite anything

 

I'm not a Situationist myself but I do like their proverb from back in the day:

 

Be realistic, demand the impossible!

 

🤣

jeffersonclasswar.jpg

When Spurs go 3 up versus Utd, I get the cold sweats...I have a memory from a certain game. So, I'm glad we fixed that little issue tonight. Hard work though as usual 🙈🤣 

jeffersonclasswar.jpg

Spurs 3-6 Liverpool! Another defensively shambolic display from Spurs who could've conceded about 10. Completely wipes out the 5-0 win last weekend and that's another bundle of goals conceded after 3 in the week and 4 against Chelsea at home two weeks ago. 8pts behind Nottingham Forest now and several clubs vying for the European places. You have to feel that Ange has to win the League Cup and Europa League to save his job but he may not even get the chance especially in the latter. 

3 hours ago, J4MES OX4D said:

Spurs 3-6 Liverpool! Another defensively shambolic display from Spurs who could've conceded about 10. Completely wipes out the 5-0 win last weekend and that's another bundle of goals conceded after 3 in the week and 4 against Chelsea at home two weeks ago. 8pts behind Nottingham Forest now and several clubs vying for the European places. You have to feel that Ange has to win the League Cup and Europa League to save his job but he may not even get the chance especially in the latter. 


Not surprised considering Spurs are missing 3 first team defenders and goalkeeper to injury…

42 minutes ago, Lurch said:


Not surprised considering Spurs are missing 3 first team defenders and goalkeeper to injury…

 

Yep, it's really telling that we miss the centre partnership in particular.

 

Although Bissouma seems out of sorts lately and not playing to previous standards, he was poor today.

jeffersonclasswar.jpg

12 hours ago, Lurch said:


Not surprised considering Spurs are missing 3 first team defenders and goalkeeper to injury…

Ange should've adjusted his tactics because he seems to play the same risky high line no matter who is in the back 4. Could've even gone for a back 3 yesterday and probably would've been more solid by jamming the midfield. 

On 12/23/2024 at 10:37 AM, J4MES OX4D said:

Ange should've adjusted his tactics because he seems to play the same risky high line no matter who is in the back 4. Could've even gone for a back 3 yesterday and probably would've been more solid by jamming the midfield. 


I know this is what the pundits said but honestly I don’t think it would’ve really made much difference, and at least it made for an entertaining game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy