Jump to content

cyberninja2601

FGers
  • Posts

    2,081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by cyberninja2601

  1. People seem to be making arguments based on principal which is fine but i don't quite understand the concern. I played MW, I have no idea home many maps there are because I think I have only played 5-6 tops. The same maps always come up in the rotation. Perhaps its the mode I play but I know there's more maps than that. Other cods were the same. Nuketown, the map with the boat, terminal, crash, High rise, firing range
  2. looks like it is even more than that. If you play MW you rank up in Cold War. Shipment 24/7 anyone? Only thing that wouldn't work is the gun attachments but you could get your ranks pretty quickly that way
  3. Will zombie help you level up? Special ops did and it was pretty easy to get 30K XP every game. if not, i guess that's why they got nuketown
  4. People have been playing "hills and Kills" on Modern warfare where kills also count for point. Maybe they forgot good old traditional hardpoint. Domination also has a new mode, TDM domination. Again kills are now part of the points so killing and K/D now matters for the win Where there any improvements since last week? The enthusiasm for the game was pretty low after that weekend
  5. I am not. I encountered to technical issues, however I was bored the 2-3 games I played. MW is a much better game as far as I am concern, so I rather play that with the little amount of time I have
  6. Played a few games. It was painful. I am going to stick with Modern Warfare/Warzone
  7. Well, you can beat free so it is worth a match or two. I didn't mind the game play on the alpha that much, but I got bored very quickly with the maps and constant TDM which is one of my least favorite game modes. I'm mostly playing modern warfare killstreak confirm (which is a lot of fun) or Warzone anyways
  8. Enough to all buy xBoxes 😉?
  9. I could see people on my friends list so that's not the issue. Most people were playing something else which is fine I play MW on the Xbox. I got feedup with PS+ and their networking woes. Never had a problem with Microsoft I just took the opportunity on the PS4 since the games was free and figured and might run into some of you. Being in California, most people are asleep by the time I get on so it doesn't make that much difference.
  10. I tried a few matches. I hadn't been online in probably a year. couldn't help but notice that I didn't see a single FG member on my friends list playing I guess we are all COD out. I didn't mind the game, however I found myself bored after 2-3 matches and turning it off. Most of the matches were TDM which I despise. I like the score streak system. It might get people to actually play the objective but I don't see myself spending too much free time on this game either
  11. I don't think they need it. I just can get to the target better by dragging my finger rather than the joy stick. I've managed 5 nukes at this point. Never got close to any of that we any CODs. The sniper rifles rule.
  12. I am playing it. and liking it. Playing on my iPad and managing the control better than I ever did on the PS4
  13. I agree. Another aspect is quite frankly the USA "worships" the gun. I don't think I have ever seen anyone but a american on this board with real gun pictures, playing with real guns. Going out shooting things is seen as a fun thing to do. Canada I think ranks #7 in world in gun ownership per capita and has many of the same social problems that he USA does. It is adjacent to the USA and plays the same games., sees the same shows and watches the same movies. We have had our mass shooting too, however they are extremely infrequent comparably speaking. So the problem is not owning, entertainment or social issues. Canada however requires licensing, training and background checks for gun ownership. The estimate is there there are 34 guns for every 100 persons which is a lot of firearms
  14. I am sure when you look at your retirement fund and what ever portfolio you might have you feel differently They aren't doing anything illegal nor do you have to buy the product. I keep hearing a number of people on this site complaining about how Activation sucks and is a poor company. Then a few days later I read on how everyone purchased the game anyways.
  15. Yes it is. And as a public company that is the fiduciary duty and responsibility. Ours is to not buy shit and they their share holder will demand better products which hopefully they can execute on
  16. I would agree that it depends. People on my team do HTLM, Python, tcl, C++ depending on the project. Most of them are rather similar, once you learn one, they others come easily
  17. Not worth spending the money prosecuting based on the crime The guy is done professionally and as become a joke, What's sending him to prison and spending over $150/year gonna resolve It;s not like he can be a repeat offender. Who the hell is going to hire him?
  18. Amen to that
  19. Must be a NASA hammer
  20. All I could think of reading this is that I am getting soft in my old age and "pointy hair boss". First thing that came to my mind is the that I would ask one of the "kids" on the team to go and do that for me Patrick
  21. I would understand if this was April 1st but seriously ????
  22. No you are free to pay $20 or free not to pay $20 Your choice
  23. Well I finally learned a mode where lag does not matter. I got to pretend to be a chair or a wheel barrel. Cool
  24. @McNasty Stop mincing words. Tell us how you really feel
  25. cyberninja2601

    MW4

    This is what they said to their share holders on the earnings call which could send Bobby to jail if it was proven to not be true: Activision will take a multi-pronged approach to funding that investment. First, the company will lower priority for games and initiatives that are not meeting expectations. Second, Activision will cut costs by integrating many of its sales, marketing, and sponsorship positions across the business, and lay off about 8% of its total workforce, removing what the company called "unnecessary levels of complexity and duplication" in certain parts of the business. With an estimated 9,600 employees last year, that means the company will reduce its staff by nearly 800 workers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy