Those weren't facts though - those were allegations that weren't proven on any level. The only admissible evidence provided by Heard was a couple of audio recordings that didn't stem into any physical contact and a questionable aftermath photo of a wine bottle being smashed. Depp provided audio evidence of heard admitting to several instances of physical altercations, there was also an admission that part of his finger was severely injured with a sharp instrument and also where Heard took a shit on their bed.
The only 'evidence' Heard could submit was hearsay in which most was comfortably countered and photos taken by her which were heavily questioned for credibility and ultimately dismissed due to flimsiness. Depp is no saint as been said but Amber Heard is despicable. She loved this entertainment when riding the #MeToo wave of attention but not when it's on her.
The High Court case will probably be overturned on appeal with Heard being deemed an unsafe witness having committed perjury on the stand - the CPS would be within their rights to pursue a charge and seek a conviction. The outcome of that trial was based purely on he said/she said and thanks to the rigorous lawsuit in the US, Heard has been exposed for lying on many occasions which negate a lot of evidence verbally presented in that trial.
They are both as bad as each other in some respects but there is no doubt that Amber Heard is a toxic, narcissistic sociopath and a compulsive liar to boot. Just because she's a woman doesn't mean she can play the victim eternally.