Leaderboard

Love it 😅 Norwegians and swedes have always been "enemies" and smack talked each other but tonight I support Sweden.

I know there's a lot of die hard nerd COD fans (no disrespect to anyone), but does ANYONE actually wear COD socks? Or keyrings? Back packs etc? 😂

Did not expect Serbia to lose that. They were looking good but they switched off 2nd half and to let that lazy Shaqiri run half a pitch and score they probably deserved to lose in the end.

Wankers

ffs

Have to support Die Mannschafft in this one. Quality team. Would be different if Zlatan was still on the Sweden team and doing shit like he did against England with that bicycle kick 😜

Walk in after a day driving, switch on the TV and ...Germany 0 Sweden 1...what?!?!

I was a bit surprised Southgate kept Alli on for so long against Tunisia as he was clearly struggling very early on. Resting him entirely would be a good idea and I'll be thankful if the injury wasn't made worse by keeping him on the pitch so long Monday. I'm 50/50 about starting Sterling - he needs confidence and playing the likes of Panama could be a great opportunity however he may have another bad game which could be a major problem for him personally and even worse for England as a whole especially if he's a costly inclusion at the expense of another promising player. I'd like to see Rashford or Vardy start and possibly bring on Lingaaaard or Sterling as impact players. We may have won Monday and missed a shitload of chances but there were parts of the game we were a bit below par so any changes would be forgiven.

Open beta available for PS4. 27gb download it looks like. Let us know how you think it is.

You mean a Man Utd shirt? 😎

I agree 100% with you here. They screwed up when they started putting missions and top end gear in the DZ.

Sounds like Alli is likely to be out for the Panama game. Possibly a straight swap for Loftus-Cheek. What do you guys reckon? Makes sense to me. I'm also 50/50 on Sterling/Rashford. If I'm honest, I'd rather Rashford started ahead of Lingaard but if we keep the same team I'm cool with that. Remember, we did win and dominated the game.

Certainly makes the final round of games interesting in the group - even Brazil can still go out despite being top now. Serbia just can to hold on for an easy draw but one loss of concentration from literally the whole team and now the group is wide open.

I'm not sure if they just copy AC Origins that it will be well received. I remember how Far Cry 3 to Far Cry 4 should've been just as good but it suffered from the 'its good, but needs something more' syndrome.

Emre Can is a free transfer fo Juventus. Justin Kluivert is now an AS Roma player. Serie A making a few better signings for a change. Kluivert is a great player, such a bloody quick winger.

I think a lot of people were burned out on COD and the modern setting when MW3 dropped - I'd played MW2 and BO solidly for two years and with the old IW (West, Zampella and co) having left the franchise too; I just wasn't all that enthusiastic at the time from what I remember. They actually did a very good job of getting this game out at all with all the shit going on behind the scenes and it did have a lot of new features and ideas such as strike packages, weapon leveling and new killstreaks. Not bad for a game on a two year cycle with half a studio missing due to a lawsuit. Certainly better than any of the blockbuster budgeted shit on 3 year cycles we've seen on this gen.

I hope the game remains as a single player experience where everything is crafted by hand and revolves solely around the story. The likes of EA and other AAA publishers may keep suggesting single player games are done with and they keep being proved wrong over and over and this game will likely maintain the trend. I can't see this game going online - I think this was just a PR sweetener and if the game was to have MP elements; they would've been focused on that from the start and it would be a selling point. The online features in a lot of these open world games are quite pathetic anyway even especially on games as a service titles. I'd take a 100 hour game that's beautifully developed from the ground up and tells a compelling and engrossing story that lasts a couple of months over some online title with restrictive and shallow gameplay elements in the most generic way possible.

Dark Zone was a good idea on paper but poorly implemented. Don't think it was ever truly improved either especially to the tune of the main game. I'd rather they just had choice of either PvP servers or PvE. The original suffered because of gameplay limitations which made it nothing more than a lobby shooter with co-op elements but hopefully TD2 will support large populations and more interactivity outside of just your party anywhere on the map.

Don't ever forget everyone, if you have someone in mind that you think they should get a nice warm 'Feel Good' gift, please let me know (just PM me). Equally if you want to help the cause you know what to do. I'd like to do 1 or 2 more in the coming weeks.

Division is the one game I really don't enjoy PVP. So for me I want to know more about the settlement system and the new factions in the game.

Although people are asking for this, why would/should Sony do it? They're the current market leaders and it won't benefit them at all. Or maybe the real question is: Would MS do it if they were currently winning the console race?

The whole backlash and rebel from the community about this is probably on par when they released Infinite Warfare and people refused to buy it!

Not bad for a free game