The3rdWalker

Be mindful that these are all buzzwords for both the PS5 and this Xbox. The plus side is is slight under a high end PC. I would expect most games could run 1080p or 1440p at 60fps, and some 4K 60fps depending on the engine; you're not hitting 120 FPS though, full stop. The 8k will most likely be an "upscale" type nonsense just so they can say 8k every 11 seconds. 8K and 120Hz will be thrown around a lot this coming generation, but all that means, I believe, is HDMI 2.1 display output support. Grabbing a snippet from the Games Subreddit. While buzzwords like 8K and 120 Hz sound either mindblowing or misleading, depending on who you're asking, there are many good things to come out of both Project Scarlett and the next PlayStation supporting HDMI 2.1. Just quickly on 8K, it's entirely possible that 8K technology will decrease in price as drastically as 4K has over the last 7 years. At the very least, Project Scarlett and the next PlayStation should be capable of doing things like outputting the system UI at 8K, or 8K media playback (assuming things like video codecs and/or DRM don't get in the way in future). The big advantage of having HDMI 2.1, discarding the established buzzwords, is better support for more advanced secondary features at resolutions that are already popular like 1080p and 4K. The extra bandwidth of HDMI 2.1 will enable full HDR10 support for resolutions like 4K at higher refresh rates without needing to resort to chroma subsampling which can reduce the clarity of things like text. 4:2:2 chroma subsampling is required in order to do HDR10 at 4K/60 with HDMI 2.0b, but with HDMI 2.1, HDR10 is supported with full chroma intact all the way up to and including 144 Hz. At lower resolutions like 1080p and 1440p, HDR10 will have full chroma sampling at 240 Hz. HDMI 2.1 also supports features such as Dynamic HDR (HDR grading that changes frame-by-frame), eARC (allows for full Dolby Atmos over an audio return channel link), DSC (display stream compression for higher resolution and refresh rate content), and full HDMI standard variable refresh rate support (FreeSync over HDMI is currently a bit of a hack). In my opinion, it's these advantages that are going to be more noticeable to the vast majority of users over the next few years.

How asinine is a move to make a sequel rather than continue the title...

There's no point in using text chat. Send out your flare, enjoy the fight. Perhaps chat in lobbies if you need a specific part but there's no reason to chat.

Overall extremely promising. I like the direction they are headed in.

Honestly if Sony keeps up this nonsense with being isolated they are going to fuck themselves. Sony has always had the better hardware in the console market but that's only going to go so far, especially when beta test reports of Stadia have been SOLID.

Cross-save for PC, XBox and Stadia is all but confirmed while Sony does not know what they want to do with it. Going free to play explains the new Eververse store that has everyone upset.

Also I can play with you on PC!

Yup, a bunch of quests that you have to do to unlock harder behemoths.

Hunting Parties of 4. I believe a few of the Americans play it. There's also a small group of us on PC that play it. Here is a sample fight from yesterday, I did it while waiting for the grill to heat up:

There needs to be some sort of opt in or boy howdy will console players have a bad time against PC. But on the other hand, I'd say almost a third of all console FPS users "cheat" and use a XIM already. (It's a huge problem in Rainbow Six and OW console) I have to say as of right now with no dlc, free maps the game has my attention, and I haven't given a look to this franchise in almost a decade. This is their cash cow to fuck up.

So I own both MHW and now decided to give Dauntless a try. While MHW is a complete experience Dauntless is a surprisingly fun time and with way less setup. (Do you only have 30 minutes to play? Well you can get 3-4 hunts in) Best of all, ITS CROSS PLATFORM! That means us PC members can play with any console members at anytime, use in game voice (or Discord) and kill some things. I'm not typically very good at monster fighting, souls game-esque where you learn attack patterns and so on but I have to say I am digging this after one night. We should all pick this up. (It's free)

Information about Dauntless Developer(s) Phoenix Labs Publisher(s) Epic Games Engine Unreal Engine 4 Platform(s) Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4, Xbox One Release May 21, 2019 Genre(s) Action role-playing Mode(s) Single-player, multi-player Dauntless takes place in a fantasy setting, where a cataclysmic event has torn the world apart, releasing monstrous creatures known as Behemoths that prey on the surviving humans. Players take on the role of Slayers to take down Behemoths, collecting loot that they use to craft and upgrade weapons and equipment as to take down larger and more powerful Behemoths. While hunting, the game plays as a third-person action game; the player uses a combo system to attack the creature, while monitoring their own health and stamina gauge. Such hunts can take upwards of twenty minutes of in-game time to complete. The game can be played both as single-player or cooperatively with up to four people. Dauntless vs. Monster Hunter: World- Dauntless is a less hardcore, more friendly monster hunting game. The combat is less rewarding, but still fun to execute. The monsters feel less alive, but still interesting to fight. The art style of Dauntless really sells a more interesting fantasy world than Monster Hunter: World’s realistic dinosaur look. Dauntless is vibrant, cheerful, and relaxing to play in the opening hours. It’s the perfect starting point for a player interested in monster hunting or for someone who just wants to hang out with friends. Dauntless also has something new to play and check out every few weeks. But Monster Hunter: World is still the king monster hunter when it comes to skill and game play. It can be very frustrating, but taking down a Tempered Deviljho is more satisfying than anything we’ve felt in Dauntless so far. The skill it takes to defeat that beast is something players only gain after dozens of hours in game and a lot of investment. That said, Dauntless just came out, and we haven’t had a chance to hit the late game yet. The choice between the two comes down to accessible and fun for Dauntless, or difficult and more satisfying for Monster Hunter: World.

The thing is with America, most policies are widely accepted by its citizens. It's just our government that doesn't accept it. 🤣

They better figure out a non shit version with the CWL putting up 60mil franchise fees for teams.

• ⁠Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) • ⁠Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2009) • ⁠Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2011) • ⁠Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2016) • ⁠Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) On Treyarch's side, we have: • ⁠Call of Duty: World at War (2008) • ⁠Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010) • ⁠Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012) • ⁠Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) • ⁠Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 (2018) • ⁠Call of Duty: Black Ops 5 (2020) The game is really all in on the BO and MW name yeah?

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare https://twitter.com/jasonschreier/status/1131924425526468609?s=20

https://kotaku.com/sonic-the-hedgehog-movie-delayed-to-2020-to-fix-sonics-1835007489

4/7/7 is the standard right now. Second, now that console players are getting use to it the clear times have gone way down.

Now?

See you there.

GRW has an amazing PVP mode. We should play it one time Phil.

It will never happen in our country.

Ghost Recon Wildlands had some of the best player versus player ever in a game. I'm excited to see what this is about.

I was planning to wait the 6 months until it hits Steam. I still will.

It's the best mechanical MK game ever currently. However, I'm not buying it out of principal until their change their bullshit mtx system in it. That mobile game type bullshit can kick rocks. I really want the game but I am not going to support that type of nonsense.