The problem with Tim Tebow is that he was presented to the world as if he was Jesus of Nazareth reborn with a golden arm.
He was/ isn't, he was barely responsible for the wins that Florida took during his time there. Yet Tebow's mother, the Media, and his publicist would tell you otherwise. (This is where he goes south, and it’s not his fault, but! he is beholden to his own "Cult of Personality")
He then went onto the NFL where just a comparison of his stats will show that he is crap.
QB record: 7-4 (11th), completion percentage: 46.5% (34th, worst), interception percentage: 2.2% (9th), yards per completion: 13.7 (3rd), yards per game: 123.5 (35th), QBR: 72.9 (28th), sacks taken: 33 (12th), sacks percentage when attempting a pass: 10.9% (34th, worst), comebacks led in the 4th quarter: 5 (3rd) and game winning drives: 6 (tied for 2nd). So there are the stats, cold, hard, honest, undeniable.
There is no question that based on statistics Tim Tebow is an average-to-below-average NFL quarterback.
Tebow is what’s called a "Project Quarterback", which means that the head coach and offensive coach will take this dude on and make a project out of him. They will try to work on his strengths and get his head where it should be.
The only reason they would do this is because most scouts and coaches also use their "Gut" as a measure of a player. Tebow has loads of intangibles, (Things that cannot be measured)
Tebow was a hard worker, a hard player, and a really dedicated study of playbooks and game footage. By all accounts he was a model player, never complaining, never causing a fuss; but he was also never improving.
His accuracy sucks, his throwing motion sucks, and he is totally unreliable as far as reading a defensive line.
And that’s why Tebow's "career" in the NFL is dead.
Huge loads of hype, for nothing. Tebow was Vaporware
Comparing that to Bronies isn't a good fit. People were not ridiculed for liking Tebow; they were ridiculed for trying to promote a bad player as the best player.
I've yet to hear a Tebow fan being labeled as a Furry.
The reverse cannot be said. I hear all the time that Bronies are Furries because they insist on ponifying and over sexualizing everything.
I could care less either way, but just wanted to point out the disparity.
Now, all that said, Trekkies would be a much better comparison, but even then you have end up with the base argument of "Should boys play with dolls/girl things? Or should they play with Guns and Science/ boy things?"
//Potential spin off thread "Why is Star Trek considered a boy show, and why is science considered Masculine?