PS5 players won't get future Bethesda games | TechRadar
WWW.TECHRADAR.COM
It looks like future Bethesda titles will be Xbox exclusives
It was bound to happen. MS won't have spent all that money just to let their main competitor have their games.
PS owners will be upset but then PS owners also liked to brag that PS has the best exclusives.
Personally I'm fine with it as I'll have both consoles.
It's not a good thing if the game will put you in a lobby where you have a bad ping just so you're playing with people of the same skill. Ping should be the number one priority for matchmaking. It should be ping>skill not skill>ping.
Accoring to Xclusive Ace the SBMM in this game can affect your ping now as it prioritises skill over everything else. In MW2019 your ping would be most important but not any more.
As far as I'm aware older CODs did have some sort of SBMM but it was only there to protect the REALLY bad players, meaning people with disabilities etc. I'm fine with that but let everybody else play everybody else. When I first played COD4 I got absolutely destroyed as it was the second game I played online (the first being Gears 1). I didn't cry or give up. I kept at it until I was the totally average player that I am today 🤓
As @J4MES OX4D said: Just give us a complete game!
The last 2 CODs have had a pathetic amount of content at launch. 6-8 maps is just not good enough.
Get rid of SBMM or EOMM (engagement optimised matchmaking) or whatever it is, in public matches. Pubs should be casual, quick play.
I'd like a near future setting as well as it gives them devs some creative freedom for the weapons and gadgets they could put in the game.
Make bloody Warzone its own separate game with its own separate studio!
And just give us Titanfall 3.
It's got a new 6V6 map and they're making a Strike version of Miami but in the day time. Plus loads of shite they'll want us to buy in the store. I don't even know why I'm posting this as I haven't played the game at all this year 🤷♂️
I wasn't planning on getting COD this year but if it is WW2 again then there is 0% chance of me getting it. Especially if it's by Sledgehammer as their other WW2 game is my 2nd most hated COD after Infinite Borefare.
I'd certainly play it. If it was F2P then I'd probably buy some MTX's which is something I absolutely refuse to do in current CODs as I'm not paying £50-60 for the game and then buying other shit as well.
I really don't understand why they don't just stop releasing a COD every year - well, maybe release a new campaign for £30 or whatever - and instead just keep updating a core game like Siege or Overwatch do. They should just copy bloody COD mobile at this point. I've played it and it's actually good fun: loads of weapons and modes, and they take maps from EVERY game that's been released.
Warzone to remain ‘front and center’ to Call of Duty franchise for a ‘long time’
CHARLIEINTEL.COM
Activision has extensive content plans for Call of Duty: Warzone, and the free to play Battle Royale experience is here to stay.
Sounds like Activision are making an absolute shit ton of money from Warzone so they've decided that mode is what is most important now.
WW2 and IW were a hell of a lot worse. I can't decide which is out of those 2 was the shittest TBH.
To me MW and CW are basically the same game just set in different eras. Except CW has Ninja and no doors. And slightly better maps.
Season 2 will apparently bring back........ Firing Range and Summit AGAIN 🙄 With all the awesome maps at Treyarch's disposal, why is it always the same fucking maps they bring back? I want Grid, Crisis, Yemen, Overflow, Rush, Mirage.
The jump from MW2 to BO1 was very jarring. Although I think I enjoyed BO1 more.
Core in BOCW isn't as bad as previous Treyarch games. I think I just don't like the longer TTK. I much preferred the TTK in MW.