Total War Three Kingdoms

[J4MES OX4D 10,186]

Anyone got this yet? Actually looks much better than expected and even IGN gave it a 9.3 score. When I first saw the game before it was delayed it was in a bit of a state but they really turned it around into a very impressive package. 

[GazzaGarratt 11,165]

No, sorry. Is this a follow on game in Total War series?

[J4MES OX4D 10,186]

1 hour ago, GazzaGarratt said:

No, sorry. Is this a follow on game in Total War series?

It's a standalone part-spin off, part new game in the series or something. Not sure where or how it fits though but after they went to Warhammer from the likes of Rome, I've given up on series consistency that's for sure! 

[phil bottle 9,955]

Rome 2 was great. Warhammer killed my enthusiasm, mostly cos of the publisher releasing part of a game and releasing the rest as DLC. No more for me.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

[J4MES OX4D 10,186]

8 minutes ago, phil bottle said:

Rome 2 was great. Warhammer killed my enthusiasm, mostly cos of the publisher releasing part of a game and releasing the rest as DLC. No more for me.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 

Strategy games are abused as hell by bad industry practices. Paradox are the worst but Sega are equally bad. I can't deny games aren't supported well post-launch particularly the Paradox range of titles but so many of the contents in these 'expansions' could be included in the basegame and you feel others are deliberately withheld.The quality of TW's expansions are nowhere near as significant as the ones Paradox churn out so that makes it even worse. It's bad enough they even charge for blood and gore. 

[GazzaGarratt 11,165]

I want to finally start Stellaris properly before any other strategy games but with some decent ratings it'll be worth looking out for a decent deal on it.