Ed Nott was shot and Sam Shott was not. So it is better to be Shott than
Nott. Some say Nott was not shot. But Shott says he shot Nott. Either the
shot Shott shot at Nott was not shot, or Nott was shot. If the shot Shott
shot shot Nott, Nott was shot. But if the shot Shott shot shot Shott, the
shot was Shott, not Nott. However, the shot Shott shot shot not Shott - but
Nott. So, Ed Nott was shot and that's hot! Is it not?