Jump to content

like this


Recommended Posts

Ed Nott was shot and Sam Shott was not. So it is better to be Shott than

Nott. Some say Nott was not shot. But Shott says he shot Nott. Either the

shot Shott shot at Nott was not shot, or Nott was shot. If the shot Shott

shot shot Nott, Nott was shot. But if the shot Shott shot shot Shott, the

shot was Shott, not Nott. However, the shot Shott shot shot not Shott - but

Nott. So, Ed Nott was shot and that's hot! Is it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy