Jump to content

Kent - Art 'n' Stuff


Palle

Recommended Posts

So lately I've been doing a lot of photo retouching because I'm going to a apply for a job that I found, which involves a lot of retouching of cosmetic products, jewelry, models and clothing for various companies. Now I need to improve my portfolio for my application.

 

 

Please take a look at these pictures and give me your opinions; Is it good? Anything that needs improving? Too much?

 

The first two pictures are before-after of the same image, one natural and one that has a bit dreamy, almost painted effect.

 

1: http://fav.me/d735zsg

 

2: http://fav.me/d7360qd

 

 

Here's another I made two days ago

 

http://fav.me/d72xgkd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing that jumps out at me is beware of making images blurry, the subject look fake and creating different texture areas within an image. When you airbrush and/or use layers at different opacities over one another you start losing texture in the image. Different images have different textures going on in them depending on areas of exposure to light, if they’re color or B&W etc... A great way to combat this is by using selections and adding grain. (Filter/Texture/Grain) Again images are different some have large grain some small, you can fuck with the settings in PS. But by adding grain you can reintroduce texture back into an image by using a layer at like 2-15% depending on areas.

 

Take her cheek for example. If you have 20 layers for her cheek and you have it looking good but there is no texture select the 20 cheek layers copy and merge the 20 layers into 1 and add grain to that over top of the 20 original layers. Then mess with that layers opacity to dial it in. If you mess around with it what I’m suggesting will become clear. Adding low opacity grain to areas you’ve airbrushed will bring the image back close to original. I’m sure you’ve seen a porn image or 5,000 where the girl is so airbrushed that she looks like silly putty. Over all I think they’re good!

jpw_tyrannosaurus-rex_zpscpttjstm.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The one thing that jumps out at me is beware of making images blurry, the subject look fake and creating different texture areas within an image. When you airbrush and/or use layers at different opacities over one another you start losing texture in the image. Different images have different textures going on in them depending on areas of exposure to light, if they’re color or B&W etc... A great way to combat this is by using selections and adding grain. (Filter/Texture/Grain) Again images are different some have large grain some small, you can fuck with the settings in PS. But by adding grain you can reintroduce texture back into an image by using a layer at like 2-15% depending on areas.

 

Take her cheek for example. If you have 20 layers for her cheek and you have it looking good but there is no texture select the 20 cheek layers copy and merge the 20 layers into 1 and add grain to that over top of the 20 original layers. Then mess with that layers opacity to dial it in. If you mess around with it what I’m suggesting will become clear. Adding low opacity grain to areas you’ve airbrushed will bring the image back close to original. I’m sure you’ve seen a porn image or 5,000 where the girl is so airbrushed that she looks like silly putty. Over all I think they’re good!

 

 

Thanks for the detailed answer. I completely understand what you mean, I really didn't think of using it when retouching photos. It kind of adds that photographic value right back instead of leaving it looking like a painting.

 

I gave it another go with the same picture, using another technique and adding microscopic uniform noise to the blurred out layers on top of the original image. The extra layers are all copied from the original by using the lasso tool, then blurred out with gaussian blur with 4/8 pixel radius and after that, I lowered the opacity of each layer to 45-70%. Then I added uniform noise to each individual layer, about 4 pixel radius on a picture that is 6400x4047 and 225PPI.

 

Here's the result

 

http://fav.me/d73af44

 

For reference this is the original picture

 

http://www.moviehole.net/img/Mary-Winstead.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol I know right.

 

 

Thanks! This is the company and the stuff I will be working with

 

http://www.peas.pro/portfolio/

So you'll be photoshopping pictures and stuff?

'Tis a smart job oppurtunity: if there are models. there will be a need for people that'll touch up their pictures. :)

 

Hope it goes well!

 

edit: can't get over how many times better your picture is from the original. x)

DM9ON.png


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you'll be photoshopping pictures and stuff?

'Tis a smart job oppurtunity: if there are models. there will be a need for people that'll touch up their pictures. :)

 

Hope it goes well!

 

edit: can't get over how many times better your picture is from the original. x)

 

 

Yes, mostly retouching pictures of make-up products, clothes and jewelry for display in stores and such. Maybe later retouching models too, I don't know right now.

 

Thanks, I'm pretty satisfied with how the last one turned out :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy